Feminism isn't Your Ancestral Property for You to Redefine. Feminists aren't Your Slaves to Do What You Want

 

“Social equality is a state of affairs in which all people within a specific society have equal rights, liberties, and status, possibly including civil rights, freedom of speech, property rights, and equal access to certain social goods and social services. Social equality requires the absence of legally enforced social class or caste boundaries and the absence of discrimination motivated by an inalienable part of a person's identity.”

Read the above 10 times. Feminism and social equality are not your bequeathed ancestral property for you to redefine.

So many culture vultures are redefining feminism. Apparently, feminism isn’t about women doing everything men do. Also, it’s apparently not about women dressing “vulgarly.”

In other words, it’s “Men will decide what women should do and can do. Women should wear the dresses men approve.”

It’s just soft re-establishing of patriarchy, these redefinitions.

Everything, including drinking, clubbing, wearing what we like/comfortable in, cutting penis-shaped cake for a hen party, talking about sex, and owning our own bodies is feminism and social equality.

Yes. And when someone shames a guy’s dick size/libido, for not drinking/smoking/for being a virgin na keapen da. If you ridicule men who do housework, saani la mukkuna seruppala adi vanguva. If you bully effeminate, reedy, short men, summa thorti thorti veluppen. This is also social equality. FOR MEN.

Your redefinitions… well, shove them up your arse like you try to shove them down our throats.

 


What’s with your definitions of how a feminist should be? Why do you want feminists to toe your line?

Every problem feminists tackle comes from patriarchy. Less than 100 years ago, your forefathers splashed cow dung on Savitribai Phule for going to school to teach girls.

Now, you’re splashing diatribe at what resulted from Savitribai’s feminism = women making choices as a result of education.

It’s called sequenced evolution. Why is the "feminist we want" is a feminist from the past working on common problems during their times? New times induced issues warrant new solutions. 

I am a certified TESOL teacher. I had posted my course certificate, my cooking, my opinions on my IG. But, all kannis can see is the sports bra I wore while studying. How is your gilma conducive yellow brain my problem? You stealing my pictures is against the law. Me wearing a sports bra when studying so that I can keep cool and minimize electricity, water, and detergent usage actually helps the planet. I know this because I am educated. I have a DIY rainwater collecting facility in my backyard. These are on my IG too. How did these escape your vision kannis? I even work for a social enterprise that complies with UN Sustainable Development Goals. I am excited about Ooho edible water bubbles and raindrop cakes. So many modern-day feminists do all these. To which you turn a blind eye. All you can see is cleavage, boobs, ass. Of course. What else can you see when you take the challenge of making the country rank 1st in porn-viewing?

These memes are made by people who are not even feminist and don't even intend to become one.

Savitribai was denied education so she fought for it. You deny women autonomy over their bodies so we fight for it. In the future, if Blue Origin denies commercial space flight for women and LGBTQI, feminism will fight for it. If the Internet of Things becomes gendered, feminists will speak against it.

No sense of time. No knowledge about evolution and what happens in the world. The result is stupidity and entitlement. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Evangelist Christian vs Le Me

I was Sexually Assaulted for Rejecting a Boy

Of Mother's Milk, Public Breastfeeding, and Caste